The Spacetime Metric

Economy, work and abundance

Energy leaves the price of everything — not gets cheaper, leaves — and every number an economy is built on moves at once.

What abundance looks like from the inside: not idleness, but a square full of people making things because they want to.

The capability this page assumes

A sealed vacuum-energy device manufacturable in quantity, aneutronic and lattice fusion as its first industrial door, transport that carries no reaction mass, and phase-controlled matter assembly.

Horizon: First deployments arrive with the first sealed device and the first sustained lattice gain. The reorganisation of prices follows within a generation.

This page assumes the thesis in full: a sealed device drawing power from the quantum vacuum at chip scale, aneutronic and lattice fusion as the first door, transport with no reaction mass, and phase-controlled assembly of matter itself. The headline change is that marginal energy cost goes to zero — no fuel to buy, no fuel to lift, no fuel to ship. The deeper change is that scarcity stops being the founding assumption of economics, work moves toward what energy cannot buy, and the central question becomes who is allowed to own the source.

The capability we assume

Before the economics, the state of the evidence, because a cost curve drawn on an unsettled claim is worth nothing. The ledger below is the Moddel cell: the claim on one side, every artefact that has been tested and how it was excluded on the other, and the independent replication that would settle it.

Before you move anything — what do you expect?

Optional, and there is no score. The instrument below works exactly the same whether you answer or not.

A small device is reported to put out power with no apparent input. What do you expect an honest ledger of that claim to look like today?

The Moddel cell, and the ledger that would settle it

A tunnelling diode about two nanometres across with a Casimir cavity on top, reported at about seventy watts per square metre with no apparent input. This is the ledger: the claim on one side, every artefact that has been tested and how it was excluded on the other, and the one control the field most needs. Filter the rows by what they are, and by which apparatus they belong to.

The claim, as its author states it

Reported power density
70 W/m²
For comparison, a solar cell over the same area
210 W/m²
Insulator the electrons tunnel through
2 nm
One patented device, up to a terahertz cut-off
6.6E-10 W
Candidate measurement artefacts investigated by the author
9
Read the claim at a size you can picture
Output at the reported density
7E-3 W
Single patented devices needed for one watt
1.52E9
The artefact ledger, sorted by what each row isA single row of blocks, one segment for each kind of ledger entry: measured evidence that supports the claim, artefacts tested and excluded, an artefact the authors argue against without ruling out, and the questions they leave open. Each segment is drawn in proportion to the number of rows the current filter places there, and the table beneath carries every row with its apparatus, its status and the paper that states it.
  • Measured evidence — 5
  • Artefact excluded — 5
  • Argued against, not ruled out — 1
  • Left open by the authors — 2
The nine candidate artefacts of the 2022 device paper are enumerated in that paper's own appendix, which this site does not reproduce. The rows below are the exclusions the library's sheets state in their own words, each labelled with the apparatus it belongs to — so a reader can never mistake one experiment's artefact list for another's.Nothing here moves on its own. The ledger refilters only when you change a control.

Measured evidence: 5. Artefact excluded: 5. Argued against, not ruled out: 1. Left open by the authors: 2

The rowWhat it isWhich apparatus
Short-circuit output rises as the Casimir cavity is made thinner, for cavities filled with PMMA and with silicon dioxide alike.This is the trend the author identifies as the signature to look for, because a thinner cavity suppresses more of the long-wavelength modes. It is a dependence on geometry, which is what separates this claim from a thermal one.The paperMeasured evidenceThe tunnelling diode with a Casimir cavity
The trends are reported across many thousands of devices produced in dozens of batches.A count of devices is not a replication, and the paper does not present it as one. It is what makes a systematic fabrication artefact less likely, and it is reported here as exactly that.The paperMeasured evidenceThe tunnelling diode with a Casimir cavity
Nine candidate measurement artefacts were investigated by the author, and none was able to explain the observed results.The enumeration is in that paper's own appendix, which this site does not reproduce. The count is reported as a count.The paperArtefact excludedThe tunnelling diode with a Casimir cavity
A Casimir resistor through a high-frequency line into a diode with a terahertz cut-off gives 0.66 nanowatts per device at a matched load.The patent also gives the recipe: micrometre-scale cells of chromium, silicon dioxide and aluminium, wired into series and parallel arrays.The paperMeasured evidenceThe tunnelling diode with a Casimir cavity
The Joule-Thomson effect, in the gas-flow experiment.Excluded: the lock-in phase was inverted, which indicates cooling rather than the heating the artefact would produce.The paperArtefact excludedThe gas-flow experiment
Turbulence in the flowing gas, in the gas-flow experiment.Excluded: the Reynolds number sits far below the turbulent threshold at flows under two centimetres per second.The paperArtefact excludedThe gas-flow experiment
Absorption or adsorption at the membrane, in the gas-flow experiment.Excluded: the signal did not scale with membrane surface area, which it would have to if the surface were producing it.The paperArtefact excludedThe gas-flow experiment
Frictional heating of the gas, in the gas-flow experiment.Argued against but not ruled out: the ordering across gases comes out wrong, and the dependence on flow is linear where friction would make it quadratic. The authors say so themselves.The paperArgued against, not ruled outThe gas-flow experiment
The measured power stayed below one microwatt for every gas and sample, about three orders of magnitude under the prediction.The authors call the result tantalising but inconclusive, and name what they would do next: nanopores of consistent size and shape, the radiation imaged to find its source, and its spectrum measured.The paperLeft open by the authorsThe gas-flow experiment
Rectifying the zero-point field with a diode, or with an antenna feeding a diode.Excluded as a route, by the same author's own review: the field is in true equilibrium, so detailed balance binds each step separately and no net power can be drawn that way.The paperArtefact excludedThe thermodynamic route analysis
Extraction from Casimir cavities is consistent with thermodynamics in principle.Cole and Puthoff worked the entropy through both a reversible squeeze and an irreversible one, and the books balance. The permission slip is old and it is real; what it permits is a device, not a conclusion.The paperMeasured evidenceThe thermodynamic route analysis
Where the energy ultimately comes from.Left open by the author in his own words. That is the right way to leave it, and it is the question the settling measurement below would begin to answer.The paperLeft open by the authorsThe thermodynamic route analysis
A freestanding graphene sheet rectified into a diode circuit reached forty picowatts at one diode.Kept beside the cell as the clean comparison, not as support: that device draws on thermal fluctuations at a single temperature, and its authors keep the accounting that way.The paperMeasured evidenceThe clean comparison beside it

The measurement that would settle it

Output power per unit area from cavity-bearing and cavity-free devices on one wafer, measured in the same session by a second laboratory, with the difference surviving the artefact list. One wafer, two populations, one session: that is the control the field most needs and the one nobody has published.

Keep the two claims apart, because keeping them apart is what makes either one assessable. Thibado's graphene harvester rectifies the thermal ripple of a freestanding sheet and reached forty picowatts at one diode, with the accounting explicitly at a single temperature. That device draws on thermal fluctuations. The cell above is a claim about geometry.

Scope: a ledger of what has been measured and what has been excluded, with every row sourced. It is not a verdict, and it does not need to be one — the settling measurement is named above and somebody can go and take it.

The source. A sealed device draws sustained power from the quantum vacuum, and it is manufacturable. Chapter 6 follows the three funded programmes building it and the rule they engineer inside — Charles Chase states it against himself: nothing comes out of the vacuum unless you break symmetry or run out of equilibrium. Harold White's target for his Casimir power cell is power density comparable to a solar cell, connected in parallel and stacked in three dimensions. Ashton Forbes's name for the consumer form is a free energy microchip that makes a phone run forever. The physics is taught from the beginning in the zero-point field course.

The first door. Fusion gets there first industrially, and Chapter 12 explains why. The rate at which nuclei tunnel through the Coulomb barrier is set by the local electrostatic environment, and that environment is set by the vacuum — so the tunnelling rate is an adjustable parameter, and the barrier stops being a wall. NASA Glenn published that mechanism in Physical Review C in 2020, twice: electron screening plus Oppenheimer–Phillips stripping inside a deuterated metal lattice. Douglas Miller's name for the architecture is vacuum-catalysed fusion — harness the vacuum, then use fusion as the intermediary, because fusion is the most efficient energy generation available inside three-dimensional reality. The fuel that matters is aneutronic, proton and boron-11, which returns charged particles you convert directly.

And what that does to cost. The sentence the whole page turns on: with a vacuum energy source the marginal cost of energy goes to zero. No fuel to buy, no fuel to lift, no fuel to ship. Say it in cost terms, because that is where it is exactly true. Two more capabilities share the same root: transport carrying no reaction mass, and phase-controlled assembly of matter, with deposition Chase and Moe Arman calculate at around 0.2 nanometres. Chapter 13 is the ledger of how far each link has travelled.

First-order effects

Fuel leaves the invoice. Energy runs on the order of a tenth of the cost of most manufactured goods, and much more for metals, glass, cement and fertiliser. That line goes to nearly nothing. What is left is the machine, the materials and the people.

Generation stops being a logistics industry. Mines, tankers, pipelines, refineries, transmission towers: a device that makes power where power is used deletes most of that chain. The grid's job becomes balancing, not delivering.

The heat engine goes. Almost every power station on Earth is a way of boiling water, and the Carnot ceiling takes its cut. Aneutronic fusion returns an ion beam one way and an electron beam the other, and current is induced directly in a coil. No steam cycle, no turbine, no ceiling — the architecture Eric Lerner's dense plasma focus work is aimed at. Steel, cement and glass, which still burn things because they need heat above a thousand degrees, go electric by default.

Distance stops charging by the mile. A craft that carries no reaction mass has no fuel budget to trade against cargo, and its running cost falls to maintenance and crew. Remote places stop paying a premium on everything shipped in — the transport and logistics page follows that thread.

Operating cost turns into capital cost. The deepest first-order change and the easiest to miss. Today you rent energy forever. Here you buy a machine once. Household budgets, industrial planning and public finance are all built on the first arrangement.

Second-order effects

Prices fall unevenly, and the pattern is the story. Energy-heavy goods fall hardest — metal, fertiliser, cement, glass, water, freight, and anything made of them. Land, care, craft and attention barely move. Within a decade the price of stuff against people's hours inverts compared with the whole industrial era.

Recycling wins on arithmetic. Separating a mixed material back into pure elements is mostly an energy bill, which is why digging new ore beats un-mixing old metal today. Remove the bill and the landfill becomes the better ore body — and cheapness is the only thing that ever makes a practice universal.

Industry unsticks from geography. Heavy manufacturing sits where power is cheap. When power is equally cheap everywhere, factories move toward people and good places to live, and regions written off as too remote get a second chance.

Energy stops working as an asset class. A large share of world commodity trading, sovereign wealth and national strategy is organised around fuel. Fuel nobody needs to buy is not an asset. That money and talent go looking for the next scarce thing — a story picked up on the peace and geopolitics page.

Petroleum loses the fuel market, not the industry. One correction to how this transition is usually imagined. An energy source that needs no fuel does not abolish petroleum. It abolishes the fuel market. Petroleum is also the feedstock for plastics, for fabric, for the housing of the device you are reading this on. That sector does not vanish. It stops being an energy business and becomes a materials business, which is what most of its volume already is. The disruption is real and it is enormous, and it is narrower than the version people fear. Saying so precisely is what makes the larger claim credible.

Matter becomes something you assemble. Chase's phase-controlled matter beam is aimed at combining atoms in new ways and depositing them at around 0.2 nanometres. Ashton's response is the one a reader has: "this is alchemy we're talking about now" (4 September 2026). A factory in that world looks less like a furnace and more like a printer working at the size of an atom.

Third-order effects and beyond

Scarcity stops being the founding assumption. Economics is the study of allocating scarce means, and energy has been the deepest of those means since the first fire. Remove it and you do not get a world without economics — you get an economics of attention, trust, land, skill and time. It is the most interesting consequence on this page.

Time becomes the budget people watch. When goods are cheap and hours are not, an hour of attention is the expensive item. Expect that world's status goods to be handmade, taught, performed or grown by someone you know — the things that stayed scarce.

The measure of a country changes. For two centuries national fortune tracked what sits under the ground. Here it tracks what is in people's heads, and the biggest winners are the countries with the fewest resources and the best schools.

Ownership of the source becomes the central political question. This is not a product, it is a phase change — in Ashton's words, "it is not just a game-changer, it is literally free energy and it obsoletes every form of propulsion that exists" (Infinite Efficiency, 1 September 2026). He also expects the rollout to be licensed rather than open: not a reactor in every house, but a government-issued microchip in every phone. Which of those two arrangements arrives is an economic and legal decision, not a physical one, and it is being made now.

And the frame for all of it. Chase's line, worth putting on a wall: the universe is a giant energy cycle. An economy is simply the part of it we keep accounts for.

A day in that world

Mira wakes before the light and walks down to the workshop with tea in her hands. She maintains the sealed units — one for every forty households in the valley, plus the big one under the water plant. The morning list is short: a fan bearing singing in unit nine, a seal check at the school, a new unit to place at the orchard.

Unit nine is in a cellar under a bakery. She hears the bearing before she reaches the door, a thin note under the smell of bread. The unit is warm and silent, no bigger than a chest freezer, its casing scuffed from eleven years of being leaned on. She swaps the fan and drinks the coffee the baker pushes into her hand. Neither of them mentions a power bill, because there is not one. The valley bought its units the way it once bought a bridge.

At the school the seal check takes twenty minutes and the questions take an hour. A boy wants to know why the unit never runs down. She tells him the truth — that it does, slowly, and that the physics is an asymmetry and a ledger rather than magic — and draws the closed loop on the board the way her own teacher drew it for her. He mentions that his phone has never been charged, not once, the way you would mention the weather.

The orchard is the good part of the day. The new unit will run the desalination skid, and by spring there will be water on the terrace where nothing has grown in her lifetime. A freight craft brings the crate over the ridge and sets it on the grass without a sound and without burning anything, which she still finds slightly rude of it.

Walking home in the dusk she passes the square, where somebody is teaching somebody else the cello badly and loudly. The lamps come on along the wall. She does not think about where the light comes from.

Numbers that change

The same quantities, side by side

Every line above is one quantity read twice: what it is today, and what it becomes in the world this page assumes. Here they are in two columns, so the pairs can be compared instead of remembered.

Which quantities to show
How many of this page's quantities go to zeroA row of small squares, one for each quantity in the table. The filled squares are the quantities that go to zero in the world this page assumes; the outlined squares are the ones that change in some other way.
  • Goes to zero
  • Changes some other way
The same quantities, side by side
QuantityTodayIn the world this page assumes
Marginal cost of energy itselfGoes to zeroA metered flow you rent for life.Zero: no fuel to buy, no fuel to lift, no fuel to ship.That is the exact economic content of the phrase infinite efficiency, and it is worth stating in cost terms rather than as a claim about thermodynamics.
Energy in the price of a manufactured goodOn the order of a tenth, and far more for metals, cement and fertiliser.A hundredth or less, because what remains is the machine and the materials.
Electricity in the cost of smelted aluminiumOn the order of a third.A rounding error, which is why recycled metal would undercut new ore almost everywhere.
What is already committedWhite has raised around twelve million dollars for the Casimir power cell, backed by the Limitless Space Institute, and the Defense Intelligence Agency commissioned thirty-eight reference documents on this technology stack, two of them on aneutronic fusion propulsion. No sheet in this library carries that figure; the awards it does carry are an NSF Phase I of $274,920 and a 2026 SpaceWERX Phase I.The first line of the ledger.
This is a consequence table, not a measurement. It assumes the capability stated at the top of this page and follows it out; the physics under that assumption, and how far each link has travelled, is taught in the chapters and courses listed there.

On this ledger: 1 of 4 quantities go to zero. The other 3 change without disappearing, which is the half of this page that is easiest to misread.

What it would take

Close the ledger, in public, then get it repeated by strangers. Chapter 6 names the milestone: a device net-positive over a complete closed cycle, with drive and measurement counted, published in full. One result is a finding; two independent results are a technology. Build the apparatus so somebody else can build it too, and publish the parts list.

Sustained gain in a lattice. NASA Glenn published real nuclear reactions in deuterated metal. The next milestone is more energy out than in, sustained. That is fuel being burned efficiently — a different claim from drawing on the vacuum, and always a separate sentence. Clean Planet in Japan, with Tohoku University and Miura's industrial boilers, and Astral Systems in the United Kingdom are independent lines on the same phenomenon. If you work in materials, loading, lattice quality and deuteron density are yours.

Aneutronic direct conversion. Proton and boron-11 returns charged particles rather than neutrons, which is what lets you induce current straight into a coil. Lerner's dense plasma focus work reports peak ion energies in the range that reaction needs. Getting from there to a machine removes the steam cycle from the world.

Make the metrology unambiguous. Net-power claims live or die on measurement, and Josephson junctions already define the volt to extraordinary precision — see the junction course. A standards body could draft the test protocol before the first device exists.

Rebuild energy law and public finance. Tariffs, subsidies, utility regulation and fuel taxes all assume a metered flow. Economists can model that transition now, and the work needs no device at all.

Stewardship

Distribution is a design decision. A device cheap to make is only cheap to own if somebody decides it should be. The difference between a world where every village owns its unit and one where every village rents it is written into licensing terms and procurement rules, early. Draft those with the care given to the physics.

Argue for ownership while the question is open. Ashton expects a licensed rollout — a permitted chip rather than a household source. That is a forecast about institutions, not about physics, and forecasts about institutions can be changed by people who show up. Ownership, repair and resale are worth fighting for now.

Protect the dignity of work through the transition. Some jobs here become unnecessary within a decade. The humane version pays for retraining first, and treats the people who ran the old energy system as the natural operators of the new one. They already have the safety culture.

Keep the measurement open. Published data, shared apparatus and independent replication defend against both overclaiming and suppression. A field that measures in public earns trust it never has to ask for.

Keep asking things of people. Abundance is a gift only if a society still expects something of its members. The best versions of this world have more teaching, building, caring and making in them than this one, not less.

Signals to watch

Results from the funded device programmes. Moddel's next measurement, White's Casimir cell, Chase's tunnelling diode with its Sandia-fabricated structures, Thibado's scaled graphene circuits. Any one showing sustained power above its own losses is the moment this page stops being a forecast.

An independent replication attempt announced. A second laboratory saying publicly that it is building somebody else's apparatus matters more than any single result.

Sustained gain reported in a lattice. From NASA Glenn, Clean Planet, Astral Systems, or anyone repeating them.

A draft measurement standard. The first serious protocol for testing a net-power claim signals that institutions expect a device.

Energy-intensive industry taking positions. When cement, aluminium and desalination firms hedge on distributed generation they cannot yet name, the market has read the same signals you have.

Anything from Skunk Works. Chase worked on Lockheed's compact fusion programme — energy for everyone, and a generator on an aircraft that never needs refuelling. On whether it stopped: "you never know what Skunk Works is really up to" (5 September 2026).

What the numbers on this page rest on