MH370 leaked “orb” and “jet” videos (worked example)
attrib. RegicideAnon
Video · summary and timestamped moments
In one page
Two short clips, posted anonymously in 2014, show an airliner over open ocean with three glowing objects holding station around it in a rotating triangle. The objects converge, there is a flash, and the aircraft is no longer in frame. This site treats that footage as the observation that sent Ashton Forbes into the physics, and never as proof of it — the physics on these pages rests on Casimir measurements, the dynamical Casimir effect, lattice confinement fusion and thirty years of published propulsion literature, none of which depends on any video. What the clips do supply is a picture worth reading carefully: a three-source geometry, an object that glows brightly while reading cool on an infrared sensor, and a departure with no acceleration signature. Forbes’s own reading, in his 13 July 2026 analysis, is that the aircraft never travelled at all — the distance did. Provenance is genuinely open, published analyses trace the clips to an anonymous creator, and the two tests that would settle it are named below.
Why it matters hereThis is the site’s worked example, and it is worked in public: chapter 9 grades the plasma physics, the three-emitter geometry and the provenance separately; chapter 4 supplies the metric reading; chapter 13 keeps it in the ledger as an illustration rather than as evidence. Holding a live case openly, in parts, with the deciding measurement written down in advance, is the method the whole site is built on.
What it claims
01A wormhole or warp geometry is a topology and metric effect rather than a tunnel: identify two regions of a flat space and the traveller’s own frame sees nothing but straight-line motion at ordinary speed. Nothing races through local space, which is why the picture never requires anything to exceed the speed of light locally — the distance is the engineered quantity.0:04:04, on the simulation Forbes is reacting to
Settled physics02Forbes reads the MH370 sequence as a one-way portal: it opens, the aircraft passes through it, it closes, and from the aircraft’s own frame the transit is uneventful and instantaneous. His title states the whole claim — the plane did not teleport, space did.0:03:04
What to watch03Three luminous objects hold a rotating triangular configuration around the aircraft and then converge on it. Read as a current-loop geometry, three sources arranged that way would have overlapping vector-potential patterns that constructively interfere, and the arrangement matches the three gravity emitters aimed at a single point that Bob Lazar described in 1989. A matching configuration is a lead worth testing, not a confirmation.0:03:04; dossier THESIS section 4.1
What to watch04The infrared clip is read as a non-equilibrium plasma — electrons running hot while the bulk gas stays cool, so the object shines brightly and still registers cool on a thermal sensor — and the umbrella or orange-slice interior is read as the filamentation-and-pinch stage of a dense plasma focus seen from the side. That is the same signature as the Gulf of Oman cold orb report of 8 September 2021.dossier THESIS sections 4.1 and 4.2
What to watch05Under the frame-of-reference reading, cloaking and teleportation stop being rival explanations, because from the object’s own frame it does not move. Forbes offers this as a refinement of his own case, and the site records what it costs as well as what it gains: it absorbs a competing explanation rather than testing between them, which narrows rather than widens what the account forbids.0:04:04
What to watch06Provenance is the open question, and the two measurements that would settle it were named in advance by Forbes himself: original sensor files delivered through a documented chain of custody, or the release of the government’s own MH370 records. Until one of those lands, the case sits where chapter 9 puts it — graded in parts, with the physics carried by the laboratory work and not by the footage.dossier THESIS section 4.3; chapter 9, the evidence ladder
What to watch
Moments worth your time
- 0:00:02The analysis opens on someone else’s work: a simulation, written by an independent creator, that folds a flat square and glues its edges until the surface converges on a torus, then glues a portal to another region and converges on the familiar cylindrical wormhole picture. What the field reads here is the cleanest plain-language demonstration available that a portal is an identification of two regions, not a hole bored through anything.
- 0:03:04Forbes maps the simulation’s one-sided portal onto his reading of the MH370 clips: three orbs converge, a one-way portal opens, the aircraft passes, the portal closes. The load-bearing part for this site is the frame statement — from the aircraft’s own point of view the transit is uneventful and instantaneous.
- 0:04:04The geometry statement the site keeps, and the one part of this video that stands entirely on its own: a wormhole is a topology and metric effect, so the traveller’s path is straight-line motion at ordinary speed. What looks from outside like a disappearance is, from inside, an ordinary flight. This is standard differential geometry and it is independent of any claim about the footage.
- 0:04:04Forbes’s refinement, offered in reply to a question he says Jeremy Rys once put to him: teleportation and cloaking are not rival explanations, because from the object’s frame it does not move at all. The site records this as a narrowing — it merges two accounts that had made different predictions, and the difference between them was the observational lever.
- 0:07:09Forbes reaches for the negative-time photon experiments and argues that changing the permittivity of spacetime should let matter tunnel through the light barrier. The durable half of that idea is the medium itself: the speed of light is one over the square root of permittivity times permeability, so it is a property of space rather than of light. The negative-time result is a negative group delay in a dispersive medium, and the leading edge of any signal still travels at c — which is why this site makes the metric claim and not the superluminal one.
- 0:08:10He closes by holding up H. David Froning’s Faster Than Light and saying that everything he has just described is already in the published literature. That is the through-line of this whole library: the propulsion argument is a reading list, not a revelation.
The way in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7oMJxaR1fsThe clips are neither embedded nor reproduced here and no frames are shown. Two short videos — one visible-light, one infrared — appeared anonymously on YouTube on 19 May 2014 and are attributed to the account RegicideAnon. The Skeptical Inquirer analysis of February 2024 and Metabunk thread 13104 trace them to that anonymous creator and match the cloud layer to commercial stock HD cloud textures; no original sensor files with intact metadata have been produced. The timestamps in the moments list are into Ashton Forbes’s own 13 July 2026 analysis, The Plane Did Not Teleport, Space Did, which is the video linked from this page.
How to cite it
attrib. RegicideAnon (2014) MH370 leaked “orb” and “jet” videos (worked example). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7oMJxaR1fs
Where it sits in the curriculum
Plasmoids, charge clusters and the orbsThe metric, warp drives and wormholesThe unified pictureInertial mass reduction and transmedium craftThe evidence ladder