Historical research guide · 1042 · 2025
Exceeding the maximum classical energy density in fully charged quantum batteries
Masahiro Hotta · Kazuki Ikeda
In one minute
Masahiro Hotta and Kazuki Ikeda take a rule that looks unbreakable and break it. Charge an ordinary battery as full as it will go and each of its cells holds at most the total divided by the number of cells. That is the classical ceiling on energy density. Hotta and Ikeda show that a battery made of entangled qubits can put more than that share into a single cell, and they show exactly how. Their protocol is Hotta’s own quantum energy teleportation run upside down: instead of starting from the ground state, start from the highest energy state, which is the ground state of the same Hamiltonian with its sign flipped. Alice measures her qubit — which draws energy out at her end and, because her measurement commutes with Bob’s local Hamiltonian, changes nothing at his — and sends him one classical bit. Bob applies a rotation conditioned on that bit, and his cell now carries energy that no unitary operation could have given him. The entanglement in the top state is what pays.
Connection
Chapter 6 is about drawing usable energy out of a field rather than burning fuel, and this is that accounting made concrete and hardware-ready: entanglement in a many-body state is a resource that a local measurement plus one classical bit converts into local energy someone can take out and use. Chapter 2 gets the sharper point — the energy sitting at one place is not fixed by the global state alone, which is precisely the structure this site argues the vacuum has.
From the source
In a classical battery the energy density at each subsystem is capped at the maximum stored energy divided by the number of subsystems. Hotta and Ikeda demonstrate that a quantum battery running a quantum energy teleportation protocol surpasses that cap, so one subsystem can hold more than its classical share and that surplus can be extracted from it directly.Abstract, and Section III with Figure 2 (arXiv:2407.01832v2)
The protocol is quantum energy teleportation turned upside down. Instead of the ground state it uses the highest energy state of the Hamiltonian, which is the ground state of the same Hamiltonian with its sign reversed. The authors summarise their whole proposal in one line: quantum energy teleportation for the maximum-energy state is a quantum battery.Section I, closing paragraphs, and Section III, opening (arXiv:2407.01832v2)
The mechanics are local measurement plus one classical bit. Alice measures a Pauli operator on her qubit and draws energy out at her end; because that measurement commutes with Bob’s local Hamiltonian it leaves his local energy untouched. She sends him the single-bit outcome, he applies a rotation conditioned on it, and the paper proves his resulting local energy is not smaller than what he started with.Section III, equations 2 and 3, and the optimised operation in equations 4 to 7 (arXiv:2407.01832v2)
No unitary operation could do this. In the minimal two-qubit model the maximum-energy state has zero expectation for the total Hamiltonian, for each local Hamiltonian and for the interaction term alike, so Bob waiting or acting on his own can never rise above zero. Alice’s measurement is what breaks unitarity, and after it his local energy is strictly positive.Section IV, equations 9 and 10, the paragraph following equation 10, and equation 13 (arXiv:2407.01832v2)
The mechanism is generic rather than a feature of one design: the interaction term between subsystems enhances local energy fluctuations, in the same way that quantum energy teleportation drives a region below the ambient vacuum level. Entanglement surviving in the highest energy eigenstate is what makes the surplus available.Section III, the paragraph on the mechanism, with Figure 1 (arXiv:2407.01832v2)
The hard half is already built. The quantum energy teleportation step has been run on superconducting quantum hardware and in trapped-ion and nuclear-magnetic-resonance experiments, the authors publish their implementation code, and charging through local operations and classical communication is instantaneous — which is why they argue this route to a working quantum battery is less cumbersome than the alternatives.Section III, the paragraph before Section IV; Section IV, opening; and the implementation repository cited as reference 28 (arXiv:2407.01832v2)
The way in
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-025-04804-8How to cite it
Masahiro Hotta, Kazuki Ikeda (2025) Exceeding the maximum classical energy density in fully charged quantum batteries doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04804-8