The Spacetime Metric
STM-D-0996Paper2022Designed, not yet built

Accessing Icy World Oceans Using Lattice Confinement Fusion Fast Fission

Theresa L. Benyo · Lawrence P. Forsley

Public domain · full text

In one page

Under the ice of Europa, Enceladus, Ceres and Pluto there is probably liquid water, and probably the best place in the solar system to look for life that is not ours. The obstacle is the lid: up to forty kilometres of ice a robot has to melt or cut its way through, on power it carries with it. Theresa Benyo of NASA Glenn and Lawrence Forsley propose a power source that contains no plutonium-238 and no enriched uranium at all. Pack deuterium into a metal lattice, let the lattice electrons screen the positive charges so the nuclei fuse, and the neutrons that come out are energetic enough to split thorium or depleted uranium — materials that cannot sustain a chain reaction by themselves and so carry none of the launch-safety and security cost. This paper, given at the American Nuclear Society’s space-nuclear meeting in 2022, sets out the concept, the icy-world conditions it has to survive, and the three modelling tasks that would turn it into a design.

Why it matters hereChapter 12 treats lattice confinement fusion as the energy substrate of the whole programme, and this is the paper where NASA Glenn takes it out of the laboratory and puts it to work as the neutron source of a flight reactor. Chapter 8 gets the honest engineering frame: what a self-contained power source has to weigh, shield and survive before anything at all can be sent through forty kilometres of ice.

What it claims

  1. 01The proposed energy source uses neither highly enriched uranium nor plutonium-238. Neutrons from lattice confinement fusion fast-fission thorium-232 or depleted uranium-238, neither of which is fissile, so the reactor carries none of the fabrication, safety or launch costs that come with plutonium-238 or highly enriched uranium — and it can be throttled, which a radioisotope heat source with an 87.7-year half-life cannot.Section I.A, Innovation; and Section I, Introduction

    Designed, not yet built
  2. 02Lattice confinement fusion holds deuterons in a metal lattice at about 10²³ ions per cubic centimetre indefinitely, against the 10¹⁴ of a magnetically confined plasma and the 10²⁶ a large laser can reach for about a nanosecond. The negative charge of the lattice electrons screens and partially neutralises the positive deuteron charge, which reduces the Coulomb barrier and lets the deuterons fuse. Triggered and controlled by bremsstrahlung or by phonon-nuclear coupling, the process reaches an equivalent local deuteron ion temperature of up to 2.1 kiloelectronvolts, about 24 million degrees Celsius, against the Sun’s 1.5 kiloelectronvolts.Section I.A.1, Lattice Confinement Fusion Technology

    Published and peer-reviewed
  3. 03A fusion-fast-fission micro-reactor has already been demonstrated using natural thorium-232 and both natural and depleted uranium, at a previously demonstrated average neutron energy of 6.4 megaelectronvolts — enough to fast-fission all three. The hybrid fusion-fission experiment at the US Navy SPAWAR-Pacific laboratory produced a sustained neutron flux averaging a million neutrons per second, with the neutron energy read from neutron-germanium recoils in the detector and the fission and activation products read by liquid scintillator.Section I.A, Innovation, the paragraph on the hybrid fusion-fission reactor design

    On the bench now
  4. 04Ongoing work with the Naval Surface Warfare Centers has observed 90 to 200 watts-thermal per gram, without actinides, by a patented protocol — against the 0.54 watt-thermal per gram of the plutonium-238 in radioisotope thermal generators. Current estimates put the power density of a non-optimised lattice confinement fusion fast fission system at one third that of the highly-enriched-uranium Kilopower reactor.Section I.A.1, closing paragraph

    On the bench now
  5. 05The mission drives the reactor design rather than the other way round. An icy crust runs from vacuum to pressures possibly exceeding 10 kilobars and from cryogenic temperatures to 270 kelvin, so the probe passes through ice XI at the surface and then ice IX, II, III and XV before it meets pressurised liquid water, and each phase change alters the travel rate — which is why the power output has to be variable. The team also proposes ultrasonically assisted ice fracturing, borrowed from Navy work on supercavitating torpedoes, with the same transducer listening to its own echoes to measure ice density and possibly to communicate back to the surface.Section I.A.2, Addressing Icy World Conditions; Section I.A, Innovation

    Designed, not yet built
  6. 06What has not yet been done is named plainly: although lattice confinement fusion can efficiently fast-fission depleted uranium and thorium, this kind of fission has not been done in a high-temperature, lithium-based molten salt. The three-task programme is to fix the mission requirements, model the fast-fission process in the Los Alamos Monte Carlo N-Particle code from first principles using the measured neutron spectra as input, and then model reactor materials and shielding — including molten lithium-salt thorium and depleted-uranium cores — to see whether the mass, volume and power requirements can be met.Section I.D, Technical Approach; Section II, Conclusions

    What to watch

Read it

Abstract

Exploring the oceans of icy moons and planets requires a robust robotic probe powered by an energy source that can operate under icy world ocean conditions and be self-contained. We propose a non-fissile, compact, scalable nuclear energy source to electrically power untethered, autonomous probes to melt or bore through icy world crusts. The probe can be used for planetary (i.e. Pluto), lunar (i.e., Europa), or asteroid exploration (i.e. Ceres) where ice caps are encountered. This new approach may yield a variable output fission power source with a higher performance than ²³⁸Pu and a non-fissile alternative to a highly enriched uranium (HEU) core. This approach saves uranium enrichment expense, and both HEU and ²³⁸Pu security and launch safety costs. The reactor will produce electrical power with thermal waste heat to melt through the ice crust with possible sonic assistance. This paper will introduce the hybrid fusion-fission reactor concept, explore the potential for and benefits of this new type of nuclear reactor, and discuss the technical approach to developing this new technology.

I. Introduction

NASA proposed the Ocean Worlds Exploration Program to search for extraterrestrial life. The challenge is that up to 40 kilometer-thick ice must first be broken through to reach sub-surface oceans. These icy ocean worlds include Ceres, Europa, Enceladus, and Pluto. Each world may have a liquid water ocean beneath their ice crust. These oceans are likely heated by the parent planet's tidal forces, or in the case of Pluto or Ceres, by residual radioactive decay. A robotic probe exploring the oceans beneath must either melt or bore through the ice crust first. Consequently, the proposed probe needs to contend with hydrostatic ice pressure, ice phase and density changes, then water pressure. Such a mission requires a small, but robust and long lived, electrical energy and heat source.

The assumption has been made that one needs to melt through the ice to reach the underlying ocean. Previous autonomous probe studies have considered radioactive decay of plutonium-238 (²³⁸Pu) or a highly enriched uranium ²³⁵U (HEU) fast fission reactor as long-lived heat sources. The ²³⁸Pu energy density requires multiple Radioisotope Thermal Generator (RTG) modules for electrical power conversion with the residual heat available for ice melting. However, it is not a controllable heat source due to the ²³⁸Pu 87.7-year half-life. An HEU fission reactor, like Kilopower, has a higher energy density, and can be controlled to reduce or increase heat, but it requires significant radioactive shielding that adds mass. Both actinide-based systems have significant fabrication, safety, and launch costs.

I.A. Innovation

Instead, we propose a novel, compact, scalable nuclear energy source using neither highly enriched uranium (HEU) nor ²³⁸Pu similar to the hybrid fusion-fission generator described by Forsley and Mosier-Boss. This nuclear energy source uses Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) neutrons to fast-fission thorium or depleted uranium where neither ²³²Th nor ²³⁸U isotopes are fissile. An important advantage of using non-fissile materials is that they do not have the fabrication, safety or launch costs of ²³⁸Pu or HEU. This new energy source is sufficient to provide power and heat for untethered, autonomous probes to melt or bore through ice crusts to the ocean below, then return with samples if desired. These probes can be used for planetary (i.e., Pluto), lunar (i.e., Europa), or asteroid (i.e., Ceres) exploration where icy crusts are encountered. An example of a proposed robotic probe is shown in Figure 1.

The hybrid fusion-fission reactor design uses previously demonstrated 6.4 MeV average neutron energy sufficient to fast fission thorium, and natural and depleted uranium. Figure 2 shows data from the hybrid fusion-fission experiment at US Navy SPAWAR-Pacific with sufficient, sustained, neutron flux (average 10⁶ n/sec) indicating the neutron energy by neutron-germanium recoils within the detector. The liquid scintillator measured the alpha and beta energies (by channel) of both natural uranium decay daughters as well as fission products and neutron activation of uranium. An output heat at 500 °C or higher would enable the use of the existing Advanced Stirling Engine Generator or a closed Brayton Cycle to generate electrical power using waste fission heat to melt ice.

As an alternative to melting through the ice, sonically assisted ice fracturing may improve melting efficiency. This method borrows from Navy research on super-cavitating torpedoes while noting the Europa Tunnelbot proposed a sonar transceiver for navigation. Although high speed transit isn't expected (mission specifications expect 3 years to transit the ice), the combined melting and fracturing could shorten this time. Super-cavitation involves a sheath of bubbles along a torpedo thereby reducing friction with water. Here, we would propose penetrating the crust via a melted ice sheath vibrating against and fracturing local ice. In addition, like sonar, a sonic transducer can operate in a pump-probe manner, listening to return echoes to measure ice density directly and possibly to communicate to the surface from some depth within the ice.

I.A.1. Lattice Confinement Fusion Technology

Deuterium-Deuterium (DD) fusion has conventionally required either large magnetic fields to hold an underdense plasma at a density of 10¹⁴ ions/cm³ or large lasers to briefly compress a dense plasma with a density of 10²⁶ ions/cm³ for about 1 nanosecond. Instead, Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) uses deuterated metals at a high density of 10²³ ions/cm³ where deuterons are held indefinitely in a metal lattice. The negative charge of lattice electrons screen and partially neutralize the positive deuteron charges. This neutralization effect reduces the Coulomb barrier allowing the deuterons to fuse. LCF is then triggered and controlled by bremsstrahlung or phonon-nuclear coupling resulting in an equivalent local deuteron ion temperature of up to 2.1 keV kinetic energy (24 million °C) as compared to the sun at 1.5 keV (17 million °C).

A fusion-fast-fission micro-reactor has been demonstrated using natural thorium (²³²Th), and uranium (both natural abundance ²³⁸U and depleted DU). The 2.5 MeV energy neutrons resulting from DD fusion have been proposed to drive a deep space fission power system. Current estimates of a non-optimized LCF fast fission power density are 1/3 that of the HEU-based Kilopower system. Ongoing work with the Naval Surface Warfare Centers (NSWC) has observed 90-200 watts-thermal/gram, without actinides by a patented protocol, that exceeds the ²³⁸Pu 0.54 watt-thermal/gram in RTGs.

I.A.2. Addressing Icy World Conditions

The Compass Final Report (CFR) suggested several mission requirements when they compared ²³⁸Pu RTG and HEU based power systems for a Europa Tunnelbot probe. However, higher LCF power densities without requiring equivalent shielding would change the constraints. The Compass Final Report also noted the mission tradeoffs discussed earlier regarding ice crust traversal time by the probe.

The deepest ice drilling accomplished to date in the Antarctic was 2.1 km using 90 °C water pumped from the surface. This technique is not possible on an extraterrestrial icy world. As noted, researchers have proposed using a nuclear powered, heated probe. However, rather than using either a ²³⁸Pu radioisotope heat source or a shielded enriched ²³⁵U fission reactor with significant security and launch safety costs, we propose making use of the demonstrated lattice confinement fusion (LCF) neutron source.

LCF can drive and control a sub-critical fission reactor with less mass than traditional fission reactors with reduced shielding by producing fewer radiation by-products. The CFR suggested 100 Gy radiation exposure as the maximum, although this is arbitrary and less would be preferred. Probe radiation is harmful to onboard electronics and possible indigenous life-forms in subsurface lakes or oceans. Another advantage is that the LCF Fast-Fission design does not modify bio-signatures by radioactively denaturing biomolecules encountered during invasive extraterrestrial searches.

Laboratory observations of high-pressure ice phases introduce additional complexities requiring a variable power source. An icy crust will likely exist over a pressure range from vacuum to possibly exceeding 10 kbar with temperatures from cryogenic temperatures to 270 °K. Consequently temperature and pressure ice structure changes will likely begin with orthorhombic ice XI at the surface with transitions among ice phases IX, II, III and XV before encountering pressurized liquid water. Each of these phase changes will have an impact on probe travel rate and pressure necessitating a variable power output. Sub-surface brine lakes may exist that would require rapid changes in power output, ice melting rates, and probe orientation, especially if samples need to be taken and analyzed. The proposed study will address this variable output requirement in its preliminary power and heat source design.

Above all, LCF Fast-Fission may provide a variable output power source smaller than existing reactors which greatly advances the ability for probes to meet space mission requirements. In addition, sonically assisted augmented melting may allow the probe to bore through an ice crust faster than a solely heated probe.

I.B. Potential Impact

A hybrid Lattice Confinement Fusion fast fission reactor provides power for both melting and vibrating through the ice and has the potential to reduce mass, volume, and power requirements for the probe and its mission. These reductions are a potential game-changer for space exploration. Studies have indicated the tradeoffs among probe mass, volume, aspect ratio, and available heat to melt ice. Changes amongst these variables, in particular probe aspect ratio, volume, and ability to move through initially cryogenic ice more quickly, have a major impact on the mission profile. A faster transit through the ice by the probe will reduce probe stress and Jovian radiation damage to the lander on Europa's surface, or any other probe's surface support in a high radiation environment.

I.C. Mission Context

There are many icy worlds in our solar system. The potential for extraterrestrial life beneath these surfaces is high enough that NASA designed missions to explore these icy worlds. Specifically, the Europa Clipper mission is scheduled to launch in 2024 to Jupiter's icy moon, Europa. The mission's goal is to orbit Europa, investigate its ice plumes for biochemicals, and measure the icy crust's stability and depth to aid in selecting a landing site for the Europa Lander mission which may launch in 2027. Previously, the 1999 Galileo Jovian Mission swung by each of the Galilean moons and collected preliminary data on Europa as will JUNO in a close Europa flyby in 2022. Figure 4 shows the anticipated Europa structure from that mission's data and analyses. In addition, from that mission, Table I lists the characteristics of Europa in terms of size, surface temperature, and depths of both the ice layer and ocean underneath. Data from the Europa Clipper and Lander missions will allow an autonomous probe, such as Europa Tunnelbot, to be designed, engineered and built for a future Europa mission such as Vision 2050. There is sufficient time in the intervening years to flight test both a novel power supply and the autonomous probe at a place that resembles an icy world such as Antarctica or Greenland.

TABLE I. Characteristics of Europa.

| Parameter | Value | |---|---| | Mean radius | 1560.8 km | | Volume | 1.593 by 10¹⁰ km³ | | Mass | 4.799844 by 10²² kg | | Mean density | 3.013 g/cm³ | | Mean surface temperature | −171 °C | | Depth of ice layer | 10-30 km | | Depth of ocean | about 100 km |

The proposed probe will enable the exploration of the oceans beneath the icy crust of Europa with an architecture capable of powering the probe and a drilling mechanism with enough Watt-electric and Watt-thermal to accomplish its mission. A heated and/or (ultra) sonic drilling mechanism will enable the probe to travel through Europa's icy crust. Augmenting melting with sonic ice fracturing may significantly reduce probe transit time through the ice. This enhancement would reduce both probe lifetime stress and radiation damage to the Europa surface lander communicating with the probe.

I.D. Technical Approach

The project consists of three tasks. First, we plan to establish the likely heat flux, ancillary power requirements, allowable mass, volume, and any shielding requirements, as well as the power plant lifetime to meet the Ocean Worlds Exploration Program's objectives for a Europa Mission. Power requirements include those for internal probe operations, science package, possible sampling, ice melting and/or sonic ice fracturing and communications.

Second, we plan to model the LCF fast fission process using the Los Alamos National Laboratory Monte-Carlo N-Particle code (MCNP) from first principles and previous experimental results. For example, during the NASA LCF experimental campaign, a neutron detection system characterized neutron energies produced from the irradiation of deuterated metals. Figure 6 shows one of the many neutron signatures acquired during the experiments consisting of a deuteron-deuteron fusion and boosted fusion peaks. This neutron signature will be used as input to MCNP simulations allowing an understanding of shielding requirements and potentially nuclear reaction scaling.

Third, we plan to model different reactor materials and shielding to determine whether or not the estimated mission requirements of mass, volume and power can be met. For example, we will model two or more types of fission reactor cores including a molten lithium salt thorium core and a molten lithium salt depleted uranium core. Figure 7 shows an example geometry of a depleted uranium (DU) sample surrounded by a neutron reflector for MCNP modeling. Geometry creation within MCNP allows a 3D depiction of the desired model with an extensive material database. Figure 8 is an example of MCNP output from modeling a 6 MeV bremsstrahlung photon beam triggering photo-fission in a DU sample. The simulated gamma ray peaks indicate an iodine fission product. Other types of MCNP output include but are not limited to particle flux, particle energy, and particle collisions. The simulation results will indicate the amount of fusion and fission energy generated in the reactor core providing heat for power conversion and ice melting.

Although LCF can efficiently fast-fission depleted uranium and thorium, this type of fission hasn't been done in a high-temperature, lithium-based molten salt. MCNP modeling can reveal reactor material options allowing an appropriate hybrid fusion fast-fission nuclear reactor design. In addition to materials, the modeling can indicate alternative means of triggering LCF, effective high temperature operation and appropriate power conversion systems. For example, conducting LCF in a molten eutectic, lithium-deuterided, thorium or uranium salt at 500 °C may provide sufficient thermal energy to melt cryogenic ice while efficiently converting thermal to electric energy to power systems. There may be power tradeoffs between melting and/or sonically fracturing ice.

II. Conclusions

Future space missions that explore the icy worlds of our galaxy will need robust autonomous robotic melting and/or boring probes to enable breaking through the icy surface. Although traditional fission-based power sources could meet the requirements of such a mission, the cost and required handling of fissile materials such as HEU and ²³⁸Pu are unattractive. A hybrid fusion-fission reactor could be the answer to making accessing icy world oceans safer and less costly than using fission-based reactors.

One possible hybrid system uses Lattice Confinement Fusion which provides energetic neutrons which can fission thorium or uranium molten salts. Through comprehensive study of Europa's characteristics and the requirements for the planned Europa Lander mission, a hybrid fusion-fission reactor will be designed with LCF as the source of neutrons and molten salts as the fissionable material providing heat and power for the robotic probe. First principal modeling of LCF fast fission and previous LCF experimental results will provide guidance for building a hybrid fusion fast fission reactor that will power autonomous and compact robotic probes.

Acknowledgments

Some research noted in this paper was conducted under the NASA GRC Advanced Energy Conversion Project through the Radioisotope Power Systems Program and its successor Lattice Confinement Fusion Project with support from the Planetary Exploratory Science Technology Office, both under the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate. Additional support was provided by Global Energy Corporation, by JWK Corporation under US Navy NCRADA at SPAWAR-Pacific (now, NIWC) funded through the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Office of Naval Research and the National Nuclear Security Agency.

References

  1. NASA, Ocean Worlds: The Search for Life, science.nasa.gov.
  2. Ocean Worlds Exploration Program, Wikipedia.
  3. S. Oleson, J. M. Newman, A. Dombard, D'A. Meyer-Dombard, K. Craft, J. Sterbentz, A. Colozza, B. Faller, J. Fittje, J. Gyekenyesi, R. Jones, G. Landis, N. Lantz, L. Mason, S. McCarty, T. McKay, T. Packard, P. Schmitz, E. Turnbull and J. Zakrajsek, Compass Final Report: Europa Tunnelbot, NASA/TP-2019-220054 (2019).
  4. M. A. Gibson, D. I. Poston, P. R. McClure, J. L. Sanzi, T. J. Godfroy, M. H. Briggs, S. D. Wilson, N. A. Schifer, M. J. Chaiken and N. Lugasy, Heat Transport and Power Conversion of the Kilopower Reactor Test, Nuclear Technology, 206, 31 (2020).
  5. L. P. Forsley and P. A. Mosier-Boss, Space Application of the GeNIE Hybrid Fusion-Fission Generator, JCMNS, 29, 95 (2019).
  6. B. M. Steinetz, T. L. Benyo, A. Chait, R. C. Hendricks, L. P. Forsley, B. Baramsai, P. B. Ugorowski, M. D. Becks, V. Pines, M. Pines, R. E. Martin, N. Penney, G. C. Fralick, and C. E. Sandifer II, Novel nuclear reactions observed in bremsstrahlung-irradiated deuterated metals, Phys Rev C, 101, 044610 (2020).
  7. P. A. Mosier-Boss, L. P. G. Forsley and P. McDaniel, Investigation of Nano-Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter: Final Report, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (June 2016).
  8. P. A. Mosier-Boss, L. P. Forsley and P. McDaniel, Uranium Fission Using Pd/D Co-deposition, JCMNS, 29, 219 (2019).
  9. G. Dugala, Stirling Convertor Controller Development at NASA Glenn Research Center, NASA/TM-2018-219963 (November 2018).
  10. L. Mason, A Comparison of Brayton and Stirling Space Nuclear Power Systems for Power Levels from 1 Kilowatt to 10 Megawatts, NASA/TM-2001-210593 (January 2000).
  11. L. Mason, Recent Advances in Power Conversion and Heat Rejection Technology for Fission Surface Power, NASA/TM-2010-216761 (2010).
  12. B. Vanek, Control methods for high speed supercavitating vehicles, Ph.D Thesis, University of Minnesota (2008).
  13. JASON, Prospects for Low-Cost Fusion Development, MITRE Corporation, JSR-18-011, ARPA-E Project 1318JAPM (November 2018).
  14. NASA Glenn Research Center, Lattice Confinement Fusion.
  15. V. Pines, M. Pines, A. Chait, B. M. Steinetz, L. P. Forsley, R. C. Hendricks, G. C. Fralick, T. L. Benyo, B. Baramsai, P. B. Ugorowski, M. D. Becks, R. E. Martin, N. Penney, and C. E. Sandifer II, Nuclear fusion reactions in deuterated materials, Phys Rev C, 101, 044609 (2020).
  16. M. Lipoglavšek and U. Mikac, Electron Screening in Metals, AIP Conf. Proc., 1377, 383 (2011).
  17. L. P. Forsley, Space Power: The Genie Fast-Fission Sub-Critical Core, American Nuclear Society, Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, NETS-2018, Las Vegas, NV (28 February 2018).
  18. L. F. DeChiaro, L. P. Forsley, P. A. Mosier-Boss, B. M. Steinetz, R. C. Hendricks, K. J. Long, P. Rayms-Keller, M. Shea, S. Barker, T. L. Benyo, V. Pines, A. Chait, C. E. Sandifer II, D. L. Ellis, I. Locci and W. D. Jennings, A Multi-Laboratory Study of Anomalous Elements and Magnetic Field Orientation Effects in LENR Codeposition Experiments, in review (2021).
  19. US Patent 8,419,919, System and Method for Generating Particles.
  20. Phase diagram of water, Wikimedia Commons.
  21. A. Hendrix, et al., The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds, Astrobiology, 19, 1 (2019).
  22. S. M. Howell and R. T. Pappalardo, NASA's Europa Clipper — a mission to a potentially habitable ocean world, Nature Communications 11, 1311 (2020).
  23. Europa Lander, Jet Propulsion Laboratory mission page.
  24. Europa/Ocean Worlds Lander Mission Concept, Europa Lander Pre-project Science Engineering Teams Meeting, 14 May 2020.
  25. T. Goorley, MCNP6.1.1-Beta Release Notes, LA-UR-14-24680 (2014).

The way in

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220002596WHAT THIS IS. The paper presented at Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space, NETS-2022, held in Cleveland, Ohio, from 8 to 12 May 2022, sponsored by the American Nuclear Society, which assigned it the DOI 10.13182/nets22-38638. TEXT. Read and reproduced from the copy NASA released through its Technical Reports Server, record 20220002596, publicly released 18 February 2022, six pages; Theresa Benyo writes from NASA Glenn Research Center and Lawrence Forsley from Global Energy Corporation. As a work of the United States Government it carries no copyright, and the prose below is the authors’ own with the reference-number markers removed, the flattened superscripts restored, and the two-column reading order put back into the printed order; Table I is reproduced. The eight figures are NOT reproduced — NASA’s own record notes third-party material in two of them, the neutron data from US Navy SPAWAR and the water phase diagram — and the text’s references to them are left as the authors wrote them. The registry record carried the year 2026; NETS-2022 was 2022 and the year is corrected here. SISTER PAGE. The later and much longer NASA report of the same programme, with the Monte Carlo core design and the power numbers, is at /library/stm-2053f063ef; the NASA Glenn experiments this design rests on are at /library/stm-2bee598802 and /library/stm-eaa504c513.

How to cite it

Theresa L. Benyo, Lawrence P. Forsley (2022) Accessing Icy World Oceans Using Lattice Confinement Fusion Fast Fission. doi:10.13182/nets22-38638

Where it sits in the curriculum

Lattice confinement fusionInertial mass reduction and transmedium craftThe evidence ladder

Provenance: Retrieved 2026-09-08 · Summary by The Spacetime Metric editorial rail (AI draft from the source text, 2026-09-07)← The library