Demonstration of single-electron buildup of an interference pattern
Akira Tonomura · Junji Endo · Tsuyoshi Matsuda · Takeshi Kawasaki · Hiroshi Ezawa
Summary and citation · read the original at the source
In one page
Feynman called the two-slit experiment with single electrons impossible to do — the apparatus, he said, would have to be built on an impossibly small scale. Tonomura and his colleagues at Hitachi built it anyway, and filmed it. Their electron microscope fires electrons one at a time past a fine charged filament, an electron biprism, which splits each electron’s wave in two and folds the halves back together; a detector that registers essentially every arrival paints the electrons onto a screen as they land. At about a thousand electrons a second the average gap between one electron and the next is 150 kilometres of flight path, so there is effectively never more than one electron inside the instrument. The first arrivals look like scattered dust. By three thousand a banding is visible; by seventy thousand the interference fringes are sharp. Each electron arrives as a particle at a point nobody can predict, and the pattern they build is exactly the one the wave predicts.
Why it matters hereChapter 2 asks the reader to accept that the vacuum is a field with structure, and this is the cleanest evidence that a single quantum object really does explore both paths through it — the interference is built one electron at a time, with no second electron anywhere in the machine to interfere with. Chapter 10 uses the same instrument: the electron biprism interferometer that resolves this pattern is the tool Tonomura’s group used to read the phase an electron picks up from a vector potential.
What it claims
01The experiment Feynman described as impossible was performed. The two-slit interference experiment with electrons, called impossible, absolutely impossible to explain in any classical way, and has in it the heart of quantum mechanics, had never been done in just this way because the apparatus would have to be made on an impossibly small scale — and this article reports a realisation of it in the form of biprism interference, recorded as a movie.Abstract; Sec. I, Introduction
Settled physics02The instrument is an electron microscope with a Möllenstedt–Dücker electron biprism and a two-dimensional position-sensitive electron-counting system. Coherent waves from a sharp field-emission tip are accelerated to 50 kilovolts, giving a wavelength of 0.054 ångström; the two beams passing either side of the filament interfere with a fringe spacing of 7000 ångström, magnified two thousand times by two projector lenses onto a detector twelve millimetres across, where the fringes are 1.4 millimetres apart.Sec. III, Experiments; Eqs. 7 to 9; Fig. 3
Settled physics03The electrons really do arrive one at a time. The arrival rate is about one thousand electrons per second across the whole field of view; the source-to-screen distance is 1.5 metres, so the average interval between successive electrons is 150 kilometres of flight path, and each electron’s wave packet is only about one micrometre long. There is very little chance of two electrons being present between source and detector at once, and much less chance of two wave packets overlapping.Sec. III, Experiments
Settled physics04Every electron is counted. A 50-kilovolt electron striking the fluorescent film makes about five hundred photons, which are converted at a photocathode, multiplied in a microchannel plate and positioned by a position sensor, with counting loss and detection noise both held below one percent and detection efficiency approximately one hundred percent.Sec. III, Experiments; Fig. 4
Settled physics05The buildup was photographed frame by frame. At ten electrons and at one hundred the arrivals appear quite at random; a dim figure of the biprism fringes begins to emerge at three thousand; at twenty thousand it is plain, and at seventy thousand — about fourteen thousand electrons per fringe — the fringes are clear. Repeating the run at intensities from five thousand down to two hundred electrons per second left the fringe contrast unchanged within a ten percent experimental error.Sec. III, Experiments; Fig. 5
Settled physics06The authors read the result as an unambiguous demonstration of wave–particle duality. A single electron passes the two paths as a wave and forms a probability interference pattern, and electron–electron interaction plays no role, since the next electron is not even produced from the cathode until long after the preceding one is detected. At the detector the same electron is observed as a localised particle: a position is selected, it cannot be predicted, and it occurs in the probabilistic way dictated by the probability amplitude.Sec. III, closing paragraphs; Sec. IV, Conclusion
Settled physics
The way in
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16104LICENCE. Published as American Journal of Physics volume 57, number 2, pages 117 to 120, February 1989; received 17 December 1987 and accepted for publication 22 March 1988. The article carries the AAPT copyright line and its own reuse terms, there is no Creative Commons statement and no open deposit, so this page carries no reproduced text — not even the abstract — and sends the reader to the source. TEXT ACTUALLY READ. The claims and the summary are written from the complete article, read page by page from a scanned teaching copy hosted by the Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física of the Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; the scan has no text layer, so the pages were read as images. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS. Tonomura, Endo, Matsuda and Kawasaki were at the Advanced Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., Kokubunji, Tokyo; Ezawa was in the Department of Physics, Gakushuin University, Mejiro, Tokyo. The registry record reached the library with an empty creator list and initials only in the metadata; the full names are restored here.
How to cite it
Akira Tonomura, Junji Endo, Tsuyoshi Matsuda, Takeshi Kawasaki, Hiroshi Ezawa (1989) Demonstration of single-electron buildup of an interference pattern. doi:10.1119/1.16104
Where it sits in the curriculum
What the vacuum isScalar waves and the field behind the fieldsThe evidence ladder